Ironically,
Lucio Gutierrez was one of the leaders of the January
2000 coup that deposed Jamil Mahuad. That coup was caused
by widespread opposition to Mahaud's plan to dollarize the economy following the nation's
1999 economic meltdown. Economic instability doesn't seem
to be an underlying cause of Gutierrez's ouster, however;
the country's economy grew by 6 percent last year, and
the nation has benefitted from high oil prices. Instead,
this most recent round of political instability appears
to be due to the Ecuadorean population's growing
frustration with corrupt politicians, as a story in today's Chronicle notes:
[Critics] point out that Gutierrez campaigned for the presidency on a populist, anti-corruption platform. But once in office, they contend, Gutierrez approved harsh economic austerity measures, installed family members in government posts and cut deals with corrupt politicians rather than jailing them.
"You give them your trust, and they do the exact opposite of what they promise," said Carlos Tamayo, a taxi driver in Quito. "They suck the blood of the people like bats."
Indeed, the
nation's political infrastructure is rife with corrpution
- the watchdog group Transparency International claims that Ecuador is one of the
most corrupt nations in the region. What really seemed to
upset the Ecuadorean people, however, was Lucio's deal
with exiled former president Abdala Bucaram and his
populist PRE party (for more information on Abdala, see
my 1997 Daily Cougar column about him):
The move that seemed to seal Gutierrez's fate was his temporary alliance with Abdala Bucaram, a former president who fled to Panama after being ousted from office in a 1997 uprising.
Pro-Bucaram legislators briefly gave Gutierrez a razor-thin majority in Congress. Gutierrez persuaded lawmakers to fire the Supreme Court and then reconstituted the judicial body with his cronies. The new court annulled corruption convictions against Bucaram, paving the way for the ex-president to return to Ecuador earlier this month.
The move sparked a wave or protests that came to a head Wednesday. Fearing a blood bath if they were ordered to fire on demonstrators, Ecuador's army and police withdrew their support from Gutierrez, and the Congress voted to dismiss him.
"The person who violated the constitution was the president," said Gustavo Larrea, director of the independent Latin American Human Rights Association in Quito. "The people were calling for a return to a state of law. This was an exercise in direct democracy."
The Chronicle
article, however, focuses on the possibility that these
"exercises in direct democracy" that seem to be
occurring with increased frequency in Latin America are
not necessarily a good thing, because they are little
more than incidences of mob rule mentality. Don't like
the president? Then there's no reason to wait until his
term of office is up - just take to the streets and force
him out of office! Rather than being an affirmation of
democracy, these uprisings could really be nothing more
than events that undermine the democratic process and
foment political instability:
[John] Walsh, of the Washington Office on Latin America, said people power doesn't necessarily lead to more democracy.
"Mob rule lends itself to any configuration," Walsh said. "The next time it happens, (people) might not agree with the result, and, in that sense, it's very dangerous."
Given the
dangers of "mobocracy," however, I can fully
understand the frustration of the Ecuadorean people and
their propensity to take to the streets. Ecuador's
leaders, democratically-elected as they might be, have
collectively done very little to improve the impoverished
nation's standard of living. As I noted in following my most
recent trip to
Ecuador, "the things that needed to have
changed the most - the poverty, the lack of basic
infrastructure, the corruption, the pollution - are still
the same. It's depressing, since the country really
doesn't seem to be better off than it was fifteen years
ago, when I first visited." Contrast this to Mexico,
the other Latin American nation I visit frequently,
which, while still very impoverished, is clearly
progressing economically and politically. Corrpution is
waning, the infrastructure is improving and a middle
class is emerging in Mexico. The same cannot be said for
Ecuador, unfortunately...
Since
Ecuador moved from a military dictatorship to a
civilian democracy in 1979, the country has experienced
the following results:
Jaime Roldos:
1979 - 1981: Killed in
a plane crash shortly into his term
Osvaldo
Hurtado 1981 - 1984: Finished
Roldos's term; he left office right as a nasty El NiƱo
and the oil bust decimated Ecuador's economy
Leon
Febres-Cordero 1984 - 1988: This guy
was lucky he survived a full term, considering the mess
that the economy was in while he was president. He did
spend an evening as a prisoner at a Guayaquil air force
base during a failed coup attempt
Rodrigo Borja 1988 - 1992: The leader of the Izquierda Democratica (Leftist Democrat) party fancied himself as an enlightened neo-Marxist reformer - until his party's congressional majority was wiped out in 1990 mid-term elections
Sixto Duran 1992 - 1996: This Boston-born architect was Ecuador's last president to serve a full term; he presided over a short border war with Peru in 1995 (Jimmy Carter intervened and the two nations later signed a peace treaty)
Abdala
Bucaram 1996 - 1997: It wasn't
hard for the National Congress to dismiss this Guayaquil
populist on grounds of "mental incapacity" -
his preferred nickname was "El Loco" and he
released an album entitled "A Madman in Love"
shortly after his election
Rosalia
Arteaga - 1997: She
served as interim president for a few days, becoming
Ecuador's first female head of state in the process
Fabian
Alacran 1997 - 1998: Caretaker
president appointed by Congress until new elections were
held; he left office during the devastating 1998 El Nino
and the Asian economic meltdown and subsequent oil crash
Jamil Mahuad
1998 - 2000: Ecuador's
economy collapsed during his presidency; he was forced
out by a coup led by junior military officers and
indigenous leaders
Gustavo Naboa
2000 - 2003: Tried to
rebuild Ecuador's economy by pressing ahead with Mahuad's
reforms, including dollarization. Ecuador's official
currency is now the US Dollar
Lucio
Gutierrez 2003 - 2005: One of
the army colonels who participated in the 2000 coup now
finds himself on the other end of the wrath
Alfredo
Palacio 2005 - ???: Good
luck, Al. You're going to need it!
If this
political instability continues, Ecuador should consider
changing its national anthem from Salve O Patria
to Won't Get Fooled Again...
(Retroblogged on August 23, 2015. Palacio finished his term but was replaced by Rafael Correa in the subsequent election. Although Correa's left-leaning, authoritarian administration has been controversial, it has also resulted in the longest period of political stability in Ecuador since the mid-90s; Correa was re-elected in 2013.)
(Retroblogged on August 23, 2015. Palacio finished his term but was replaced by Rafael Correa in the subsequent election. Although Correa's left-leaning, authoritarian administration has been controversial, it has also resulted in the longest period of political stability in Ecuador since the mid-90s; Correa was re-elected in 2013.)
No comments:
Post a Comment